She’s hysterical.
Vice President Kamala Harris has recently faced criticism for various personal attributes, including her laugh. This scrutiny has intensified as some conservatives have labeled her laughter as “crazy” and “nuts,” with former President Donald Trump mocking it during a campaign event, calling her “laughing Kamala.”
Experts argue that the derision of Harris’s laugh reflects underlying sexism and racism. According to Dr. Oneka LaBennett from the University of Southern California, this criticism highlights the intersectional challenges Harris faces as a Black woman in a high-profile role. Historically, women have been demeaned for expressing joy, with such behavior often dismissed as hysteria. The mocking of Harris’s laughter can be seen as an extension of these age-old stereotypes, which unfairly target women of color.
The review of public and media responses shows a pattern where female politicians, particularly those from minority backgrounds, are harshly judged for their emotional expressions. For instance, Michelle Obama faced similar treatment when her critiques were labeled as “angry,” and now Harris’s public displays of joy are being criticized.
In contrast, Donald Trump’s emotional expressions are not subjected to the same level of scrutiny. Trump’s campaign response framed the criticism of Harris as a reflection of her policies rather than her personality. Meanwhile, Harris herself has embraced her laughter, considering it a cherished part of her identity. Supporters argue that her laugh symbolizes authenticity and relatability, countering the negative narratives.
Feminist author Gina Barreca suggests that Harris’s laughter represents confidence and independence, traits that can unsettle some people. Ultimately, LaBennett believes that Harris’s laughter, while subject to criticism, also serves as an asset by reinforcing her genuine connection with voters.
